Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
KEY ELEMENTS IN DEVELOPING AND SUSTAINING
A COMMUNITY COALITION IN AN IMMIGRANT POPULATION
  • The Metro Boston REACH 2010
  • Haitian HIV Coalition
2
BACKGROUND:

    • HIV/AIDS affects a disproportionate number of Haitians both in the United States and in Haiti.
    • An estimated 300,000 people (4.5% of the population) are now infected with HIV/AIDS in Haiti.
    • In Massachusetts, 970 cumulative AIDS cases have been reported among Haitians.
    • Haiti has the highest rate of HIV infection in the Caribbean.
3
BACKGROUND          (cont.)
    • HIV infection in the Caribbean.
    • Encouraging community members to participate through group and community level activities
    • Conducting passed activities have brought a threshold of HIV awareness but have not mobilized and targeted subgroups in these communities
    • History of non-cooperative behaviors among Haitian Services Providers
    • SOURCES: Center for Strategic and International Studies, “Developments in Haiti’s Fight against HIV/AIDS.” www.kaisernetwork.org,  Massachusetts Department of Public Health.
4
REDUCING HIV DISPARITIES IN
THE HAITIAN COMMUNITIES
THROUGH COMMUNITY MOBILIZATION
  • GOALS
  • I: By 2007, expose approximately 18,000 or 25% of Haitians in the Metro Boston area to HIV/AIDS preventive education
  • II: By 2007, increase the capacity of leaders in the Haitian community to effectively provide HIV prevention messages to the Haitian community.
  • III: By 2004, increase the capacity of Haitian and Non-Haitian providers to effectively provide HIV prevention services to the Haitian community
5
The Metro Boston Reach 2010 HIV COALITION
  • The Coalition is a coalition of health and social service providers, clinicians, consumers, epidemiologists and community members who mobilized to reduce HIV disparities in the Massachusetts Haitian Community.
6
REACH 2010 Implementation Stage
Theoretical Framework
7
PARTNER ORGANIZATIONS
8
METRO
Boston Haitian
REACH 2010 Coalition
9
METHODOLOGIES COALITION DEVELOPMENT
  • Methodology for Coalition Building
    • The Development of General Assessment and Community Action Plan.
    • Moving from Planning to Program Implementation
    • Developing Structures and mechanism of operations.
      • A steering committee
      • A RFP Process
      • The Working Groups Model
      • Quarterly meeting.
    • Providing TA and Capacity Building on Coalition Building, Program Development and Program support
    • Evaluation
      • Formative Evaluation
      • Process Evaluation
10
STRUCTURES AND MECHANISMS OF OPERATIONS
  • Center for Community Health, Education & Research is the lead organization responsible for general planning, coordination and program implementation
  • A Steering Committee representing all partner organizations
  • The development of RFP process for subcontracting purposes based on expertise of each partner organization
  • The Development of the working groups as design team for each targeted subgroup
  • The implementation of a quarterly meeting for program coordination, update and planning
11
WORKING GROUP
  • The first target action of the Metro Boston Haitian Coalition was to convene six working group. The Working Groups were organized as Inter-Agency collaborations of providers serving similar clients.
  • Develop HIV preventive education content and intervention strategies.
  • Conduct and constantly evaluated the delivery of content to targeted subgroups within the Haitian Population.
  • Recommend change both in the content and the delivery of HIV Prevention Education.
12
WORKING GROUPS
13
Development  & Implementation of Capacity Building Operation Plan (CB)
14
OUTCOME
    • Evidence of ownership shown by Working Group in the implementation phase.
    • Leadership is shared in the group building capacity for the next generation of community Leaders.
    • Not all Working Groups are alike some require support form Lead Agency.
    • 95% rated the process as being effective (Anna Madison, Univ. of Mass).
15
KEY ELEMENTS THAT MADE THE WORKING GROUP SUCCESSFUL
    • Allowed organizations to share information and expertise.
    • Provided an opportunity for agencies to become more acquainted.
    • Provided designated time for agencies to reflect and create new ideas.
    • Provided an opportunity for agencies to develop an trusting relationship
    • Created leadership to guide future community wide Public Health Interventions.
16
LESSONS LEARNED
    •  Utilizing a group process approach in developing, implementing, and evaluating HIV prevention workshops has proved effective but lengthy
    • Coalition development requires constant skills development on group processes, management development and program development
    • Undo distrust and non cooperative behaviors necessitate shift of power and balanced decision making  from the lead organization to the structure of the coalition.

17